<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silverman, Arielle M</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pitonyak, Jennifer S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nelson, Ian K</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Matsuda, Patricia N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kartin, Deborah A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Instilling positive beliefs about disabilities: pilot testing a novel experiential learning activity for rehabilitation students.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disability and Rehabilitation</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Attitudes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">occupational therapy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physical therapy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">professional development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">simulation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1292321</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Purpose: To develop and test a novel impairment simulation activity to teach beginning rehabilitation students how people adapt to physical impairments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Methods: Masters of Occupational Therapy students (n&amp;thinsp;=&amp;thinsp;14) and Doctor of Physical Therapy students (n&amp;thinsp;=&amp;thinsp;18) completed the study during the first month of their program. Students were randomized to the experimental or control learning activity. Experimental students learned to perform simple tasks while simulating paraplegia and hemiplegia. Control students viewed videos of others completing tasks with these impairments. Before and after the learning activities, all students estimated average self-perceived health, life satisfaction, and depression ratings among people with paraplegia and hemiplegia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results: Experimental students increased their estimates of self-perceived health, and decreased their estimates of depression rates, among people with paraplegia and hemiplegia after the learning activity. The control activity had no effect on these estimates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusions: Impairment simulation can be an effective way to teach rehabilitation students about the adaptations that people make to physical impairments. Positive impairment simulations should allow students to experience success in completing activities of daily living with impairments. Impairment simulation is complementary to other pedagogical methods, such as simulated clinical encounters using standardized patients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Implication of Rehabilitation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		It is important for rehabilitation students to learn how people live well with disabilities.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		Impairment simulations can improve students&amp;rsquo; assessments of quality of life with disabilities.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		To be beneficial, impairment simulations must include guided exposure to effective methods for completing daily tasks with disabilities.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">epub</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chung, Hyewon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kim, Jiseon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Park, Ryoungsun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bamer, Alyssa M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bocell, Fraser D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amtmann, Dagmar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Testing the measurement invariance of the University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale short form across four diagnostic subgroups.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Qual Life Res</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016 Apr 26</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;PURPOSE: The University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale (UW-SES) was originally developed for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). This study evaluates the measurement invariance of the 6-item short form of the UW-SES across four disability subgroups. Evidence of measurement invariance would extend the UW-SES for use in two additional diagnostic groups: muscular dystrophy (MD) and post-polio syndrome (PPS). METHODS: Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate successive levels of measurement invariance of the 6-item short form, the UW-SES: (a) configural invariance, i.e., equivalent item-factor structures between groups; (b) metric invariance, i.e., equivalent unstandardized factor loadings between groups; and (c) scalar invariance, i.e., equivalent item intercepts between groups. Responses from the four groups with different diagnostic disorders were compared: MD (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;172), MS (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;868), PPS (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;225), and SCI (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;242). RESULTS: The results of this study support that the most rigorous form of invariance (i.e., scalar) holds for the 6-item short form of the UW-SES across the four diagnostic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the 6-item short form of the UW-SES has the same meaning across the four diagnostic subgroups. Thus, the 6-item short form is validated for people with MD, MS, PPS, and SCI.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Putnam, Michelle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anjali R. Truitt</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smith, Amanda E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Measures of aging with disability in U.S. secondary data sets: Results of a scoping review.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Health J</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015 Jul 22</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: There remain significant knowledge gaps in our understanding of aging with long-term disability. It is possible that important advances in knowledge could be gained using existing secondary data sets. However, little is known regarding which of the data sets available to researchers contain the age-related measures needed for this purpose, specifically age of onset and/or duration of disability measures. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the capacity to investigate aging with long-term disability (e.g. mobility limitation) and aging with long-term chronic conditions (e.g. spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis) using extant data. METHODS: Public use national and regional data sets were identified through existing reports, web-based searches, and expert nomination. The age- and disability-related variables, including age of onset and duration of disability, were tabulated for data sets meeting inclusion criteria. Analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: A total of N&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;44 data sets were reviewed. Of these, 22 contained both age and disability variables. Within these 22 data sets, 9 contained an age of onset or duration of disability variable. Six of the nine data sets contained age of diagnosis for a single or set of health conditions. Onset of functional limitation is in two, and onset of self-reported and/or employment disability is in four, of the nine data sets respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is some, but limited opportunity to investigate aging with long-term disability in extant U.S. public use secondary data sets.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chen, Ke-Yu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harniss, Mark</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patel, Shwetak</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, Kurt</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Implementing technology-based embedded assessment in the home and community life of individuals aging with disabilities: a participatory research and development study.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014 Mar</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">112-20</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to investigate the accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of implementing an embedded assessment system in the homes of individuals aging with disabilities. METHOD: We developed and studied a location tracking system, UbiTrack, which can be used for both indoor and outdoor location sensing. The system was deployed in the homes of five participants with spinal cord injuries, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis and late effects of polio. We collected sensor data throughout the deployment, conducted pre and post interviews and collected weekly diaries to measure ground truth. RESULTS: The system was deployed successfully although there were challenges related to system installation and calibration. System accuracy ranged from 62% to 87% depending upon room configuration and number of wireless access points installed. In general, participants reported that the system was easy to use, did not require significant effort on their part and did not interfere with their daily lives. CONCLUSIONS: Embedded assessment has great potential as a mechanism to gather ongoing information about the health of individuals aging with disabilities; however, there are significant challenges to its implementation in real-world settings with people with disabilities that will need to be resolved before it can be practically implemented. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Technology-based embedded assessment has the potential to promote health for adults with disabilities and allow for aging in place. It may also reduce the difficulty, cost and intrusiveness of health measurement. Many new commercial and non-commercial products are available to support embedded assessment; however, most products have not been well-tested in real-world environments with individuals aging with disability. Community settings and diverse population of people with disabilities pose significant challenges to the implementation of embedded assessment systems.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Friedly, Janna</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Akuthota, Venu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amtmann, Dagmar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrick, Donald</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Why disability and rehabilitation specialists should lead the way in patient-reported outcomes.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arch Phys Med Rehabil</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leadership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patient Outcome Assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patient-Centered Care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Self Report</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014 Aug</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">95</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1419-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Victorson, David</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manly, Jennifer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wallner-Allen, Kathleen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fox, Nathan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Purnell, Christy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hendrie, Hugh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Havlik, Richard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harniss, Mark</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magasi, Susan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Correia, Helena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gershon, Richard</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using the NIH Toolbox in special populations: considerations for assessment of pediatric, geriatric, culturally diverse, non-English-speaking, and disabled individuals.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neurology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Diversity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Culture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabled Persons</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Geriatrics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Language</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Institutes of Health (U.S.)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatrics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">United States</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013 Mar 12</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">S13-9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: In order to develop health outcomes measures that are relevant and applicable to the general population, it is essential to consider the needs and requirements of special subgroups, such as the young, elderly, disabled, and people of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, within that population. METHODS: The NIH Toolbox project convened several working groups to address assessment issues for the following subgroups: pediatric, geriatric, cultural, non-English-speaking, and disabled. Each group reviewed all NIH Toolbox instruments in their entirety. RESULTS: Each working group provided recommendations to the scientific study teams regarding instrument content, presentation, and administration. When feasible and appropriate, instruments and administration procedures have been modified in accordance with these recommendations. CONCLUSION: Health outcome measurement can benefit from expert input regarding assessment considerations for special subgroups.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11 Suppl 3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campbell, Margaret L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spillman, Brenda</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Putnam, Michelle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New Investigations of Aging with Disability: Results and Implications for Data, Policy, and Practice</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerontological Society of America (GSA)</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">San Diego, CA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This symposium will feature four presentations on aging &lt;em&gt;with&lt;/em&gt; and aging &lt;em&gt;into&lt;/em&gt; disability by distinguished scholars from gerontology and rehabilitation. The purpose of this symposium is to advance knowledge about the health and well-being of individuals aging with long-term disabilities acquired at different stages of the life course, and identify implications for program development and public policy. The symposium will also examine how best practices in health interventions in the fields of gerontology and disability can be used to inform each other to better meet the needs of the expanding population of individuals aging with disabilities, regardless of age of onset. &amp;nbsp;Gaps in data sources and evidence will also be discussed. Implications focus on how these findings inform federal, state, and local level policies and practices as well as international efforts to bridge the fields of aging and disability research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first two presenters focus on documenting secondary/chronic health conditions experienced by individuals aging with long-term disabilities acquired earlier in life, and outlining the results of reviews of best practices for health promotion interventions to synthesize &amp;ldquo;what works&amp;rdquo; for middle-aged and older adults aging with physical and developmental disabilities. The third presenter utilizes data from The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to examine implications of disability onset before late life for supportive services. The fourth presenter places these trends within a larger context of initiatives on healthy aging and highlights how they inform national and international work on bridging aging and disability research, policy, and practice.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>