<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crabb, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Appraisal of Personal Support Workers by Medicaid Managed Care Enrollees Aging with Disabilities</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">American Public Health Association Annual Meeting and Expo</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, Anne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Care coordination experiences of people with disabilities enrolled in medicaid managed care.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Rehabil</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016 Aug 22</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-8</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;PURPOSE: To understand the impact of experience and contacts with care coordinators on Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) enrollees with disabilities. METHOD: Primary data was collected from a random sample of 6000 out of the 100,000 people with disabilities enrolled in one state&amp;#39;s mandatory MMC program. Surveys were conducted through the mail, telephone, and Internet; 1041 surveys were completed. The sample used for analysis included 442 MMC enrollees who received care coordination. Regression analyses were conducted with the outcomes of number of unmet health care needs and enrollee appraisal of the health services they received. Race, age, gender, and disability variables controlled for demographic differences, and the independent variables included enrollee experience with a care coordinator (coordinator knowledge of enrollee medical history and whether the coordinator took into account enrollee wishes and input) and frequency of contact with a care coordinator. RESULTS: Positive enrollee experiences with care coordinators significantly related to more positive enrollee health service appraisals and fewer unmet health care needs; frequency of contact did not have any significant impacts. People with mental health disabilities and intellectual/developmental disabilities had significantly lower health service appraisals. People with mental health disabilities had significantly more unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care coordination, but not frequency of contact alone, is associated with better health outcomes for MMC enrollees. Implications for rehabilitation Care coordination is a core component of managed care and facilitates effective healthcare management for people with complex chronic conditions and disabilities. Better experiences with care coordinators is related to fewer unmet healthcare needs and more positive health care service appraisals for Medicaid managed care enrollees. The continuous development of person-centered care coordination strategies and training programs emphasizing quality relationships between coordinators and consumers should be prioritized.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crabb, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Experiences of Medicaid Enrollees with Disabilities in the Transition to Managed Care: Qualitative Analysis of Consumer Survey Responses</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">American Public Health Association Annual Meeting and Expo</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crabb, C.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The impact of family input and involvement on health and long-term services and supports appraisals and unmet needs of older adults and adults with disabilities enrolled in Medicaid managed care</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of North America</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, Anne</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Health services appraisal and the transition to Medicaid Managed Care from fee for service.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Health J</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Health J</style></alt-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015 Oct 24</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENG</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Many states are transitioning fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid into Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) for people with disabilities. OBJECTIVE: This study examined managed care&amp;#39;s impact on health services appraisal (HSA) and unmet medical needs of individuals with disabilities receiving Medicaid. Key questions included 1) Do participant demographics and enrollment in MMC impact unmet medical needs and HSA? 2) Within MMC, do demographics and continuity of care relate to unmet medical needs? 3) Within MMC, do demographics, unmet medical needs and continuity of care relate to HSA? METHODS: We collected cross-sectional survey data (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;1615) from people with disabilities in MMC operated by for-profit insurance companies (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;849) and a similar group remaining in FFS (n&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;766) in one state. Regression analyses were conducted across these groups and within MMC only. RESULTS: Across Medicaid groups, MMC enrollment was not related to either HSA or unmet needs; health status, having a mental health disability and unmet transportation needs related to HSA and health status, unmet transportation needs and having a mental health or physical disability related to higher unmet medical needs. Within MMC, in addition to better health and fewer unmet medical needs, less continuity of care significantly decreased HSA. Higher unmet transportation needs, poorer health status, having a physical or mental health disability, and less continuity of care significantly decreased unmet medical needs. CONCLUSIONS: This research points to the importance of meeting unmet needs of individuals in MMC and the need for increased continuity of care as people transition from FFS.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632026?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stobbe, G.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hertz, D.</style></author></secondary-authors><tertiary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kraft, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alschuler, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wundes, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unruh, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reynolds, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalb, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beier, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexander, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, K.</style></author></tertiary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MS ECHO: Innovative Project to Improve the Capacity of Providers  in Underserved Areas to Treat MS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, KL</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hertz, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alschuler, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stobbe, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiple Sclerosis Project Echo: Outreach to Rural Providers to Provide Innovative Collaborative Training Using Video Conferencing</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oral Presentation at NARRTC's Annual Conference, Anexandria, Virginia</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gibbons, H</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mitchell, D</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aging with a Physical Disability in Medicaid Managed Care</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poster presented at the American Public Health Association’s Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; This study examines the health care experiences and access of people with disabilities in Medicaid receiving managed care (MC) versus those in fee for services (FFS) health care over two years&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; The study uses survey data from 817 individuals (430 in MC and 387 in FFS) two years after the start of the MC initiative in addition to encounter data on health care utilization from the population of 39,653 in MC and 68,839 in FFS. The survey includes measures of health care appraisal, ease of receiving medication, and ease of using transportation. Health care utilization comprises emergency room (ER) use and days in the hospital. &amp;nbsp;Regression analyses with these outcomes included the Independent variables of age, gender, race, disability type, and enrollment in MC versus FFS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Health care appraisal and ease of receiving medication did not differ between the MC and FFS groups. However, people with physical disabilities in MC reported a worse appraisal versus FFS, while people with a mental health disability in MC reported a better appraisal versus people in FFS (p&amp;lt;.05). Also, people with physical disabilities had better access to prescriptions in MC (p &amp;lt;.05).Transportation assistance was more positive (p &amp;lt;.01) for people in MC. &amp;nbsp;Both ER use and days in hospital decreased (-8% and -18%) for people in MC and increased for people in FFS (5%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: As MC approaches increase for Medicaid participants with disabilities it is important to assess the differential experiences of various disability groups within MC and in comparison to FFS.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fogelberg, Donald J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vitiello, Michael V</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hoffman, Jeanne M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bamer, Alyssa M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Amtmann, Dagmar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparison of Self-Report Sleep Measures for Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis and Spinal Cord Injury.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arch Phys Med Rehabil</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014 Oct 23</style></date></pub-dates></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;OBJECTIVE: To investigate self-report measures of sleep disturbances and sleep-related impairments in samples of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) or spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community based. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (age &amp;ge;18y) (N=700) with either MS (n=461) or SCI (n=239) who were enrolled in a longitudinal survey of self-reported health outcomes and who completed self-report sleep measures at 1 time point. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-S), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance short form, and PROMIS sleep-related impairments short form. RESULTS: Mean scores on the MOS-S sleep index II were significantly worse for both the MS and SCI samples than those of previously reported samples representative of the U.S. general population (P&amp;lt;.0001 for each group). The PROMIS sleep disturbance short form and PROMIS sleep-related impairments short form scores of the MS sample were also significantly different from those reported for the calibration cohort (P&amp;lt;.0001 on each scale). However, although the scores of the SCI sample were significantly different from those of the comparison cohort for the PROMIS sleep-related impairments short form (P=.045), the differences on the PROMIS sleep disturbance short form were not significant (P=.069). CONCLUSIONS: Although the MOS-S scores for the MS and SCI cohorts clearly indicated significantly high levels of sleep-related problems and were consistent with existing literature, the more ambiguous findings from the PROMIS sleep disturbance short form and PROMIS sleep-related impairments short form suggest that not enough is currently known about how these instruments function when applied to those with chronic neurologic dysfunction.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, A</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Impact of Medicaid Managed Care on Health Services Appraisal and Access of Adults with Disabilities</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poster presented at Gerontological Society of America’s (GSA) Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington DC</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; This study examines the health care experiences and access of people with disabilities in Medicaid receiving managed care (MC) versus those in fee for services (FFS) health care over two years&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; The study uses survey data from 817 individuals (430 in MC and 387 in FFS) two years after the start of the MC initiative in addition to encounter data on health care utilization from the population of 39,653 in MC and 68,839 in FFS. The survey includes measures of health care appraisal, ease of receiving medication, and ease of using transportation. Health care utilization comprises emergency room (ER) use and days in the hospital. &amp;nbsp;Regression analyses with these outcomes included the Independent variables of age, gender, race, disability type, and enrollment in MC versus FFS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Health care appraisal and ease of receiving medication did not differ between the MC and FFS groups. However, people with physical disabilities in MC reported a worse appraisal versus FFS, while people with a mental health disability in MC reported a better appraisal versus people in FFS (p&amp;lt;.05). Also, people with physical disabilities had better access to prescriptions in MC (p &amp;lt;.05).Transportation assistance was more positive (p &amp;lt;.01) for people in MC. &amp;nbsp;Both ER use and days in hospital decreased (-8% and -18%) for people in MC and increased for people in FFS (5%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: As MC approaches increase for Medicaid participants with disabilities it is important to assess the differential experiences of various disability groups within MC and in comparison to FFS.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chen, Ke-Yu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harniss, Mark</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patel, Shwetak</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, Kurt</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Implementing technology-based embedded assessment in the home and community life of individuals aging with disabilities: a participatory research and development study.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014 Mar</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">112-20</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to investigate the accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of implementing an embedded assessment system in the homes of individuals aging with disabilities. METHOD: We developed and studied a location tracking system, UbiTrack, which can be used for both indoor and outdoor location sensing. The system was deployed in the homes of five participants with spinal cord injuries, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis and late effects of polio. We collected sensor data throughout the deployment, conducted pre and post interviews and collected weekly diaries to measure ground truth. RESULTS: The system was deployed successfully although there were challenges related to system installation and calibration. System accuracy ranged from 62% to 87% depending upon room configuration and number of wireless access points installed. In general, participants reported that the system was easy to use, did not require significant effort on their part and did not interfere with their daily lives. CONCLUSIONS: Embedded assessment has great potential as a mechanism to gather ongoing information about the health of individuals aging with disabilities; however, there are significant challenges to its implementation in real-world settings with people with disabilities that will need to be resolved before it can be practically implemented. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Technology-based embedded assessment has the potential to promote health for adults with disabilities and allow for aging in place. It may also reduce the difficulty, cost and intrusiveness of health measurement. Many new commercial and non-commercial products are available to support embedded assessment; however, most products have not been well-tested in real-world environments with individuals aging with disability. Community settings and diverse population of people with disabilities pose significant challenges to the implementation of embedded assessment systems.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owen, Randall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowers, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unmet Needs and Health Services Appraisal: The Role of Disability Type and Service Delivery Approach.</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poster presented at the American Public Health Association’s Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; This study examines unmet needs for and appraisal of health services for people with disabilities in Medicaid receiving managed care (MC) versus fee-for-service (FFS) service delivery approaches by disability type.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; The study uses survey data from 817 individuals receiving Medicaid in a Midwestern state. The disability type splits people into groups corresponding to their Medicaid waiver: intellectual/developmental (IDD, 193 respondents), physical (PD, 279), and mental health (MH, 198) disabilities and a group who don&amp;rsquo;t fit those groups (Other, 143). The delivery approach identifies people as receiving MC or FFS. &amp;nbsp;The survey measures health care appraisal and total unmet needs. A two-way ANOVA for those two outcomes with disability type and delivery approach as independent variables was followed by regressions including age, gender, race, disability, and delivery approach as independent variables.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Both health appraisal and unmet needs are significantly related to disability group but not with delivery approach. For unmet needs, other (1.59) and PD (2.19) have significantly (p&amp;lt;.05) fewer unmet needs than MH (3.16) and IDD (3.37). However, for health appraisal, only the other group had significantly (p&amp;lt;.05) higher ratings than ID or MH. Results of regression analyses show that unmet needs is negatively related (p&amp;gt;.01) to health appraisal and unmet needs is higher for people with physical and mental health disabilities (p&amp;lt;.01) than for people without those conditions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: Unmet needs are important for health plans (MC or FFS) to address. These results specify for which disability types unmet needs are highest so healthcare providers can address them.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kratz, Anna L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hirsh, Adam T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ehde, Dawn M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Acceptance of pain in neurological disorders: associations with functioning and psychosocial well-being.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehabil Psychol</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehabil Psychol</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Activities of Daily Living</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adaptation, Psychological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adult</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chronic Pain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Depressive Disorder</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Illness Behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiple Sclerosis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Muscular Dystrophies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pain Measurement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quality of Life</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Questionnaires</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Adjustment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socioeconomic Factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spinal Cord Injuries</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013 Feb</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">58</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain acceptance has been shown to be related to positive adjustment to chronic pain in patients presenting with pain as a primary problem. However, the role of pain acceptance in adjustment to chronic pain secondary to a neurological disorder that is often associated with physical disability has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to examine whether two domains of chronic pain acceptance--activity engagement and pain willingness--predict adjustment to pain, controlling for pain intensity and key demographic and clinical variables in individuals with muscular dystrophy (MD), multiple sclerosis (MS), post-polio syndrome (PPS), or spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHOD: Participants were 508 community-dwelling adults with a diagnosis of MD, MS, PPS, or SCI who also endorsed a chronic pain problem. Participants completed self-report measures of pain acceptance, quality of life, pain interference, pain intensity, depression, and social role satisfaction.

RESULTS: Hierarchical linear regressions indicated that activity engagement predicted lower pain interference and depression, and greater quality of life and social role satisfaction. Pain willingness predicted less pain interference and depression. Together, the two pain acceptance subscales accounted for more variance in outcomes than did self-reported pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings correspond with the broader pain acceptance literature, although activity engagement appears to be a more robust predictor of adjustment than does pain willingness. This research supports the need for future studies to determine the extent to which treatments that increase acceptance result in positive outcomes in persons with chronic pain secondary to neurological disorders.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23437995?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hirsh, Adam T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smith, Amanda E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Age and the role of restricted activities in adjustment to disability related pain.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Health Psychol</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Health Psychol</style></alt-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013 May 29</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">025-1034</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENG</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Chronic pain is common in individuals with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury and is associated with depressed mood. This may be because pain creates interference in performing and enjoying valued activities. The importance of pain interference may also vary with age, since older adults may have lowered expectations regarding function. This study analyzed relationships among pain variables, age, and mood in 521 individuals with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury. As predicted, pain interference mediated the relationship between pain severity and depressed mood. There was no evidence that older adults were less distressed by pain interference than were younger adults.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23720543?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Victorson, David</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manly, Jennifer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wallner-Allen, Kathleen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fox, Nathan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Purnell, Christy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hendrie, Hugh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Havlik, Richard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harniss, Mark</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magasi, Susan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Correia, Helena</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gershon, Richard</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using the NIH Toolbox in special populations: considerations for assessment of pediatric, geriatric, culturally diverse, non-English-speaking, and disabled individuals.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neurology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Diversity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Culture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabled Persons</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Geriatrics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Language</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Institutes of Health (U.S.)</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatrics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">United States</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013 Mar 12</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">S13-9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: In order to develop health outcomes measures that are relevant and applicable to the general population, it is essential to consider the needs and requirements of special subgroups, such as the young, elderly, disabled, and people of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, within that population. METHODS: The NIH Toolbox project convened several working groups to address assessment issues for the following subgroups: pediatric, geriatric, cultural, non-English-speaking, and disabled. Each group reviewed all NIH Toolbox instruments in their entirety. RESULTS: Each working group provided recommendations to the scientific study teams regarding instrument content, presentation, and administration. When feasible and appropriate, instruments and administration procedures have been modified in accordance with these recommendations. CONCLUSION: Health outcome measurement can benefit from expert input regarding assessment considerations for special subgroups.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11 Suppl 3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chen, Keyu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harniss, Mark</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Embedded assessment in the home and community life of individuals aging with disabilities</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Workshop on Evaluating Off-the-Shelf Technologies for Personal Health Monitoring at the 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pittsburgh, PA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Campbell, Margaret L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heller, Tamar</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spillman, Brenda</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Putnam, Michelle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New Investigations of Aging with Disability: Results and Implications for Data, Policy, and Practice</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerontological Society of America (GSA)</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">San Diego, CA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This symposium will feature four presentations on aging &lt;em&gt;with&lt;/em&gt; and aging &lt;em&gt;into&lt;/em&gt; disability by distinguished scholars from gerontology and rehabilitation. The purpose of this symposium is to advance knowledge about the health and well-being of individuals aging with long-term disabilities acquired at different stages of the life course, and identify implications for program development and public policy. The symposium will also examine how best practices in health interventions in the fields of gerontology and disability can be used to inform each other to better meet the needs of the expanding population of individuals aging with disabilities, regardless of age of onset. &amp;nbsp;Gaps in data sources and evidence will also be discussed. Implications focus on how these findings inform federal, state, and local level policies and practices as well as international efforts to bridge the fields of aging and disability research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first two presenters focus on documenting secondary/chronic health conditions experienced by individuals aging with long-term disabilities acquired earlier in life, and outlining the results of reviews of best practices for health promotion interventions to synthesize &amp;ldquo;what works&amp;rdquo; for middle-aged and older adults aging with physical and developmental disabilities. The third presenter utilizes data from The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to examine implications of disability onset before late life for supportive services. The fourth presenter places these trends within a larger context of initiatives on healthy aging and highlights how they inform national and international work on bridging aging and disability research, policy, and practice.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carter, Gregory T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Weiss, Michael D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chamberlain, Joel R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Han, Jay J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abresch, Richard T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miró, Jordi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aging with muscular dystrophy: pathophysiology and clinical management.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Activities of Daily Living</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adaptation, Physiological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adolescent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adult</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aging</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Child</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Child, Preschool</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Combined Modality Therapy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disability Evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disabled Persons</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Middle Aged</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Muscular Dystrophies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prognosis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quality of Life</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risk Assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Severity of Illness Index</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sickness Impact Profile</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Survival Analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Treatment Outcome</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Young Adult</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010 May</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">429-50</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Major advances in the fields of medical science and physiology, molecular genetics, biomedical engineering, and computer science have provided individuals with muscular dystrophy (MD) with more functional equipment, allowing better strategies for improvement of quality of life. These advances have also allowed a significant number of these patients to live much longer. As progress continues to change management, it also changes patients&amp;#39; expectations. A comprehensive medical and rehabilitative approach to management of aging MD patients can often fulfill expectations and help them enjoy an enhanced quality of life.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20494287?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hirsh, Adam T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, Kurt L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bombardier, Charles H</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Relationship of Chronological Age, Age at Injury, and Duration of Injury to Employment Status in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychological Injury and Law</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychol Inj Law</style></alt-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009 Dec 1</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">263-275</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENG</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Employment status following spinal cord injury (SCI) has important implications for financial and psychosocial well-being. Several age-related variables-in particular chronological age, duration of SCI, and age at SCI onset-have been identified as being associated with employment among individuals with SCI. Cross-sectional investigations of this topic are complicated by methodological and statistical issues associated with aging and disability. The purpose of the current study was to examine the associations between three aging variables and employment status in individuals with SCI through a series of regression analyses. Six hundred twenty individuals with SCI completed a survey that included measures of demographic characteristics, pain, psychological functioning, physical functioning, fatigue, and sleep. The results indicated that chronological age and age at SCI onset were significant predictors of employment status. A significantly greater proportion of individuals aged 45-54 were employed compared to those aged 55-64 even after controlling for biopsychosocial variables. Additionally, there was a negative linear relationship between percent employed and age at SCI onset, and this relationship was not accounted for by the biopsychosocial variables. The analyses used in this study provide one method by which to disentangle the effects of different age-related variables on important SCI outcomes in cross-sectional research. Continued research in this area is needed to better understand age-related effects on employment status, which could be used to help maximize the quality of life in individuals with SCI.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21297893?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jensen, Mark P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hirsh, Adam T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bamer, Alyssa M</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sleep problems in individuals with spinal cord injury: frequency and age effects.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehabilitation Psychology</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rehabil Psychol</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adolescent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adult</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Age Factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Age of Onset</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aged</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aged, 80 and over</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cross-Sectional Studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Georgia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Middle Aged</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Questionnaires</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Severity of Illness Index</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sleep Disorders</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socioeconomic Factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spinal Cord Injuries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Washington</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Young Adult</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009 Aug</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">323-31</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;OBJECTIVES: The two objectives of this study were (a) to replicate the previous finding of more severe sleep difficulties in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with normative samples, and (b) to examine the associations between aging variables (specifically, chronological age, duration of SCI, age at SCI onset) and the severity of sleep difficulties. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. RESEARCH METHOD: A survey was administered to 620 individuals with SCI that included measures of demographic characteristics and sleep difficulties. RESULTS: The findings indicated that sleep problems are more common in individuals with SCI than in normative samples. In addition, younger participants in our sample reported more sleep problems than did older participants. Duration of SCI and age at onset, however, were not significantly associated with sleep difficulties. CONCLUSION: The analyses used in this study provide a model for examining age effects using concurrent survey data that may be useful for other investigators interested in studying the associations between age-related variables and important health-related domains.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19702431?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hreha, Kimberly</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Matsuda, Patricia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fear of Falling in People with Long Term Physical Disability: A Potential Imprediment to Physical Activity.</style></title></titles><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">40th Annual NARRTC Conference</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Washington, DC</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hreha, Kimberly</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Molton, Ivan</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Impact of Secondary Health Conditions on Social Role Participation in People Living with Long-term Physical Disability</style></title></titles><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018 Rehabilitation Psychology Conference</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dallas, TX</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, K.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hertz, D.</style></author></secondary-authors><tertiary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alschuler, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stobbe, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Von Geldern, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kraft, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reynolds, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wundes, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexander, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalb, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unruh, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott, J.</style></author></tertiary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiple Sclerosis Project ECHO:  Outreach to rural providers to provide innovative collaborative training using video conferencing</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annual Meeting  of the National Association of Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers</style></secondary-title></titles><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johnson, K.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stobbe, G.</style></author></secondary-authors><tertiary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hertz, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alschuler, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexander, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wundes, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kraft, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unruh, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalb, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Von Geldern, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reynolds, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott, J.</style></author></tertiary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiple Sclerosis Project Echo:  Outreach to Rural Providers to provide Innovative Collaborative Training Using Video Conferencing</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Northwest Regional Telehealth Resource Center</style></secondary-title></titles><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record></records></xml>